POWER PLAY
HOMETICKETS & VENUE INFOSTREET FAIRSPEAKERS & ENTERTAINERSABOUT LNG & RENEWABLESPRESS ROOMPARTNERS & SPONSORSCONTACT US
PRESS ROOM — The Issue

1. Overview
2. The players
3. Links and reports

Overview

The Bush Administration is pushing an energy policy that will make America more dependent on foreign and fossil fuels. Part of this includes the proposed construction of some 40 LNG (liquefied natural gas terminals) on the East, Gulf and West coasts. The policy forsakes national, global and environmental interests to bring benefit to big oil and energy companies.

Bush's energy policy may result in hundreds of billions invested in new LNG infrastructure here and around the world. The final bill will be paid for by American ratepayers and taxpayers—with money that will be diverted from renewable energy development. Though LNG is cleaner than other fossil fuels, it still pollutes and contributes to global warming. LNG will further our dependence on foreign sources, will require heightened military preparedness and will add vast sums to America's trade deficit. Even fuel that comes from friendly nations may need to be shipped through less than friendly waters.

Particularly alarming to California is that federal agencies (like the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) and Congress are asserting that the final authority to site and approve energy facilities should rest with the federal government. Federal regulations are more lax than California environmental and safety standards. Court battles are likely to ensue to determine whether California or the Washington should be the highest authority.

More broadly, the siting of an LNG terminal and refinery in Long Beach may prove to be a legal test case in the tug-of-war between the states and Washington. If Washington wins politically and in the courts, California's cherished protections may fall by the wayside, not just for LNG terminals, but for refinery clean-air standards, off shore oil and the siting of new nuclear power plants. If the Bush administration has its way, California would not be allowed to "Just say no" to polluting energy projects. Nor would California be permitted to protect its own citizens from the safety hazards posed by some of these facilities.

The speakers in the Power Play program will address America's appetite for fossil fuels, and its consequences on the local, national and global stages. According to Redefining Progress, The Sierra Club, the United Steel Workers and the Blue-Green Alliance, our nation would do well to invest in renewable energy. According to recent Public Utilities Commissioner president Loretta Lynch, California doesn't need the fuel from the LNG terminals the Bush administration hopes to see built here.

The well-orchestrated and fast-moving White House and Congressional push for expanding fossil and nuclear fuels calls for prompt unified action to be taken by environmental, peace, labor, human rights, indigenous peoples', ratepayer and taxpayer groups.

Top

The players

To Come.

 

Links and reports

Download the Greenpeace report "Liquefied Natural Gas, a roadblock to a clean energy future" by Bill Powers.

Sierra Club interview with Dr. Helen Caldicott
LNG 411
Additional Sierra Club coverage on LNG.

Sierra Club California's LNG web pages

Top